Graffiti: art or vandalism ?

Is associated with the 70s and 80s, when in NY teenagers dancing in the street break-dancing and train drew with colored sprays. At first it was just a play. Then war broke out between those who painted and those who wanted to delete. Somehow, the former won, if we think that graffiti art is now considered urban. In any case, \"writers\"-IBS said that the danger of being caught by police during the \"creative process\" makes things more exciting.

If we think and more in the past, cave paintings are not really the oldest form of graffiti?

The epidemic of cocaine, weapons market and more laws are stricter semnficativ graffiti has been damaged. Many have dropped out of graffiti but many have continued despite further affected. For lack of resources have become extremely aggressive grafferii a graffer was caught unarmed agresivi.Daca most likely was beaten and robbed by sprays.
At this time physical strength and unity as in gangs become an important work experience graffer. Although laws were totally against them ... war broke out between grafferi. S\'au said during these years: skema, Dez, TRAP, DELTA, SHARP, SEEN TC5, SHY 147, BOE, WEST, KAZE, SPADE 127, SAK , VULCAN, SHAME, BIO, MIN, DURO, KEL, T KID, MACK, nicer, BRIM, BG 183, Kenn, CEM, FLIGHT, AIRBORNE, Rize, Jon 156, Kyle 156.

For or against
In most civilized countries, Graffiti is prohibited by law. You risk stiff penalties if you are caught red-handed. For example, Tony Blair, former Prime Minister of England expressed the view categorically: \"Graffiti is an art, is a crime!\" Normal, since graffiti can take and as a political manifesto. But, rather than be mad, maybe it would be wrong for politicians to read them carefully. After all, is \"Vox Populi\"! And most are delightful combinations of color ...
So next time you do not see what station because subway windows are fully painted, not get angry. It\'s just a harmless form of art ...!